COMPARED! Grok Bot vs Muse vs Dots AI Agent SHOWDOWN

Vídeo em Inglês, publicado pelo canal Lifey Guy.

About this content: The summary, key points and topics below are generated automatically from the video transcript. They reflect the content, opinions, claims and predictions presented in the video and do not represent a position, validation or fact-check by IA Dots.

Video summary

The video compares three AI agents—Grok bots, Muse, and Dots—across twelve distinct rounds evaluating cost, underlying AI models, multi-agent capabilities, application integrations, accessibility, proactive assistance, shopping features, security against prompt injection, safety guardrails, memory and privacy, workplace features, and coding capabilities.

Key points

• Muse is the only AI agent among the three that offers a free plan, while Grok bot and Dots require paid subscriptions starting at higher price points.
• Dots run on OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra, Muse runs on Meta's Muse Spark 1.3, and Grok bot utilizes dynamic backend models including Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5.
• Grok bot allows users to create multiple named bots that can collaborate in a group chat, whereas Muse and Dots operate primarily as individual agent setups with background helpers.
• Dots connect to over 4,000 apps via ChatGPT plugins, Muse integrates with major retail catalogs like Shopify and Walmart, and Grok bot interacts with apps or navigates the web using a browser interface.
• In security evaluations against prompt injection attacks, OpenAI published test results where Dots successfully resisted 16,600 hidden attack emails.
• Ultimately, Dots scored 5 points, Muse scored 4 points, and Grok bot scored 4 points, resulting in a tie between Dots and Grok bot on paper, while Muse leads in user adoption.

Topics

AI agentsCost comparisonAI modelsApp integrationsSecurity and safetyMemory and privacyWorkplace toolsCoding capabilities

Video transcript

Transcript from available captions; it may contain errors.

Grok bots, Muse, and Dots are AI agents with their own computers that keep working while you sleep. We put all three through 12 rounds to find the one you should trust with your to-do list. Round one, what it costs to start. Muse is the only one with a free plan. It's free up to a weekly usage limit, and if you need more, the power plan is $20 a month, and maximum is 100. Grok bot has no free plan, just a one-time trial credit. For new subscribers, it starts with the $30 premium tier of the X subscription, which also bundles super Grok, cursor pro, and X premium plus. Dots cost the most. Your first dot comes with chat GPT Pro from $100 a month, or a business premium seat at 125. Point goes to Muse. Did you know? The word Grok comes from Robert Heinlein's 1961 novel Stranger in a Strange Land. It means to understand something so deeply that it becomes part of you. Round two, the brain inside. An agent is only as smart as the AI model driving it. Dots run on GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI's flagship. On the artificial analysis intelligence index, an independent score built from 10 tough tests, it scores 53. Muse runs on Meta's Muse Spark 1.3, which scores 48. Meta says its stronger Muse Wonder model is coming to Muse soon, starting with subscribers. Grok bot picks its models for you and doesn't say which. On October 7th, Elon Musk posted that it will use the best back-end model for each task, [music] including Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5, which scores 58. Until Grok bot's own documents confirm that, the point goes to Dots. Round three, >> [music] >> one agent or a whole team. Grok bot lets you create several named bots, >> [music] >> a researcher, a writer, an inbox manager, even a chief of staff to run the others. You can put them in a group chat where they hand off work to each other and only pull you in for judgment calls. All your bots share one cloud computer and each gets its own screen on it. Muse is one agent per person, but it can launch swarms of helper agents behind the scenes. And you start with just one dot, which can split a job across background agents. Open AI says teams of dots will come later. Point goes to Grok Bot. Did you know? Grok Bot's computers run in tiny virtual machines called Firecracker, which Amazon built for its own cloud. Amazon says each one can start in as little as 125 milliseconds. Round four, the apps it can use. Dots plug into more than 4,000 apps through the same plugins as ChatGPT. You can even let a dot read your email without letting it send any. Muse launched with dozens of partners, plus the whole Shopify catalog, then added stores like Walmart, Best Buy, and Sephora. If an app is missing, Muse can write its own connector, as long as the service has a way in for software. Grok Bot uses connected apps where they exist, and for everything else, it simply drives a web browser, clicking and typing like you would. Point goes to Dots for sheer reach. Did you know? When you connect your email to Muse, it hides one-time passcodes and password reset links from the agent, so no one can trick it into taking over your other accounts. Round five, where you can reach it. Muse lives on iPhone, Android, and the web, and you can text it right inside WhatsApp. Meta says it's coming to its AI glasses, too. Your dot lives in ChatGPT on your computer and phone, and you can call it or message it in Slack and Microsoft Teams. Grok Bot has apps for Mac, Windows Linux iPhone iPad and Android, the widest list here. And on X, [music] you can tag @bot in a post, and your main bot picks it up as a task. Point goes to Grok Bot. Did you know Meta has also teased Muse Charm, a little pocket gadget you can talk to, and Muse is getting its own email address to get things done? >> [music] >> Round six, helping before you ask. This is what makes an agent feel like an assistant, not a tool. Muse is built around goals. One of the people who built it says her Muse spotted her son's sports tryout buried in school emails just 12 hours before it closed. Grokbot gets more proactive over time, following up on threads you dropped, but dots make this their headline feature. When you're not talking to it, a dot quietly reads your connected apps looking for ways to help. >> [music] >> In Open AI's launch example, a tester's dot noticed he'd forgotten to send an invoice, prepared it, and sent it once he said yes. And this background research is read-only, so it can't send messages or change anything on its own. Point goes to dots. Round seven, shopping with your money. Muse pays through Stripe's Link wallet. Each purchase gets a brand new card number that only works at that store for that amount for a short time. So, even if it was stolen, it would be almost useless. You approve every purchase, and Meta says Muse is the first agent covered by Link's purchase protections. A dot can buy with a card you've already saved on a store's website, but only after you approve, and moving money is always handed back to you. Grokbot can shop, too. Elon Musk had it order five Lego sets, about $240 worth, and later promised SpaceX would make users whole if it ever botched a purchase. But the company's terms of service say it is not responsible for its agent's actions. Point goes to Muse. >> [music] >> Round eight, tricks hidden in your inbox. The biggest danger for an agent that reads your email is called prompt injection, a message written to trick it into leaking your data or paying a stranger. Programmer Simon Willison calls the risky mix the lethal trifecta, private data, untrusted messages, and a way to send things out. All three agents have all three. Open AI published real numbers. In its GPT-6 Astra system card, it hit dots with 16,600 [music] attack emails hidden among 50,000. Not one attack succeeded. Then an attacker AI rewrote its emails after every failure 2,638 times. Still zero. Meta pays security researchers up to $300,000 for finding holes in Muse. Grok bots uses an AI reviewer called auto review, but we couldn't find published test results like these. Point goes to dots. Round nine, who has the final say? In Muse, a separate guard agent called the sentinel sits between Muse and the internet. Muse can only propose an action. Only the sentinel can approve it, and Muse itself never sees your real passwords. Approval pop-ups appear outside the chat, so a tricky message can't fake one. Dots let you set custom rules for each action. Do it, do it only when I say so, ask me first, or hand it to me. But Open AI's own tests found a weak spot. When 10 other tasks came in between instead of five, the share of runs flagged for stepping outside the job roughly doubled from 8.6 [music] to 19.7%. Grok bots has ask first and allow automatically rules, but its bots all share one computer and its logins. So its own docs warn not to treat separate bots as a security wall. Point goes to Muse. Round 10, memory and privacy. Muse keeps its memory as files you can read and edit yourself, and you can tell it to forget things. Your data lives on your own cloud computer, and Meta plans a fully encrypted version that even Meta can't open. One catch, Muse trains Meta's AI on your chats by default with personal details removed unless you switch it off. Grokbot keeps a separate memory for each bot. With privacy mode on, your data isn't used for [music] training. A. Dot starts with your chat GPT memory already loaded, but you can't see or delete a single thing it has noted about you. The only full reset is deleting the whole dot. Point goes to Muse for memory you can actually see. Did you know? Inside Meta's code, Muse goes by a secret nickname Hatch. Round 11, work teams. Grokbot was built inside its company first where teams made bots for sales, marketing, office work, and bug fixes. Teams can share a bot in Slack and big companies get network controls, audit logs, and recordings of what bots did. Any bot can learn a job by watching you do it once. You record up to 10 minutes in its browser and it turns that into a reusable skill. Dots come with business premium seats and companies can test specialist dots with their own identities and logins. OpenAI is also working with Microsoft to manage them alongside other workplace security tools. Muse has a version for small business with connectors like QuickBooks, Shopify, and Canva. Meta featured a grocery store owner in Iowa who works about 65 hours a week. Point goes to Grokbot. Round 12, writing code. A. Dot can hand coding jobs to Codex, OpenAI's coding agent, then check the work and bring you a draft pull request, a proposed change you approve before it goes live. Grokbot runs on the same cloud as Cursor, the popular code editor. It can start Cursor's cloud agents, then send you screenshots or a video clip and open a pull request. Muse can write code on its own computer to build tools it needs, but it's not aimed at programmers. Photo finish. It's a tie between Dots and Grokbot. >> [music] >> The final score. Dots five, Muse four, Grokbot four. Dots win on paper, but here's the surprise. The winner costs at least $100 a month, while Muse costs nothing to start, and Grokbot costs 30. And people are voting with their phones. Muse passed 5 million downloads in about 3 weeks by a Sensor Tower projection, faster than ChatGPT, Grok, or Claude ever did. Meta's internal numbers, reported by The Information, show more than 3 million people prompting it every week. Did you know psychologist Gloria Mark found people's attention on a screen now lasts about 47 seconds on average, which is why an agent that only pings you when it matters can be such a gift? So, which one should you pick? Choose Muse if you want help with everyday life, errands, shopping, family plans, and a free way to start. Choose Dots if you already live in ChatGPT, Slack, or Teams, and you want the agent with the most apps and the most published safety testing. Choose Grokbot if you want a whole team of bots, you write code in Cursors, or your company needs admin controls. Whichever you choose, start small. [music] Connect only the apps the first job needs, and keep sending, buying, and deleting behind your approval. >> [music]

Assistir ao vídeo original no YouTube

Assuntos: Agentes de IA, Dots, Muse. Publicado no YouTube em 2026-10-28.

Seleção automática por assunto e idioma. O vídeo pertence ao canal de origem.