Muse AI vs Grok Bot vs Microsoft Copilot Review 2026 ($7280 In Bonuses + Discounts)

Vídeo em Inglês, publicado pelo canal Vil Vas - Software Reviews.

About this content: The summary, key points and topics below are generated automatically from the video transcript. They reflect the content, opinions, claims and predictions presented in the video and do not represent a position, validation or fact-check by IA Dots.

Video summary

The video provides a detailed comparative review of several AI assistants, including Meta's Muse, Grok Bot, and Microsoft Copilot. It evaluates each tool across various criteria such as task automation, reasoning and answer quality, memory and personalization, integrations and ecosystem, privacy and safety, pricing, and target users, highlighting specific strengths and limitations for each platform.

Key points

• Meta's Muse is a personal AI agent featuring a private cloud computer, task automation, and a 1 million token context window, though availability is currently limited to the United States.
• Grok Bot offers strong multi-step reasoning, persistent cloud computer capabilities, broad integrations, and delegation features, scoring high in task completion and memory.
• Microsoft Copilot integrates deeply into the Windows and Microsoft 365 ecosystem, offering features for everyday tasks, document editing, and cross-platform accessibility.
• Each AI assistant is evaluated based on specific editorial scores across core categories like privacy, safety, pricing, and agent power.
• The presenter notes various caveats such as unconfirmed pricing details, regional limitations, and the necessity of user supervision for autonomous actions.

Topics

AI assistants reviewTask automationMeta MuseGrok BotMicrosoft CopilotPricing and privacyAI integrations

Video transcript

Transcript from available captions; it may contain errors.

Every single review just gives you a bunch of different features and you are still absolutely confused which is the best choice for you. What I'm going to do is I'm going to tell you just the very specific features that you actually need to pay attention to to understand which is the best choice for you based on your specific case. And on top of that, I have some discounts and crazy bonuses if you use my affiliate links. So, check out all of the links in the description. I have created custom GPTs for different softwares and instead of just getting information from the web that most of the time is absolutely incorrect, it's trained on specific knowledge. The GPT is going to ask you some questions and it actually gives you multiple answers to choose from making it super easy. And with these actually, you're going to get even better understanding what specific software you need because you wouldn't even think about these different things. And once you answer all of these different questions, it's going to give you the best software for your specific needs and maybe even some alternatives. >> News is Meta's personal AI agent. Instead of only answering questions, it is built to do things for you like sending emails, booking travel, filling in forms, and working on your goals in the background even when the app is closed. It launched on September 8th and so far it is only available in the United States. So, here is how it stacks up. We cover task automation, reasoning, memory, integrations, privacy and control, pricing, and who it is best for. First, task automation and agent power. For task automation and agent power, Muse scores 9.0 out of 10. Every user gets a private cloud computer with a full browser. So, Muse can search, fill out forms, make bookings, and complete purchases. And you can step in and take over at any point. It can also write code to build a small tool when a task needs one. And it can work on a schedule while you are away. It only pings you when something is worth your attention. The limits are that long jobs use up your weekly allowance. And some reviewers report logins that loop, stale prices, and background tasks that stopped quietly. Treat it as powerful, but not flawless. By the way, you can steal my super actionable step-by-step frameworks that you can follow to scale your business. Check out the links in the description. Next, reasoning and answer quality. For reasoning and answer quality, Muse scores 8.5 out of 10. It runs on Meta's Muse Spark models. And the newest published version, Muse Spark 1.3, has a 1 million token context window. On the independent artificial analysis index, the version tested scored 61, which is competitive with the top models. And Meta's own benchmarks show it trailing the strongest rival only narrowly on most agent tests. The caveats are that it does not show its reasoning and it abstains more often instead of guessing. Meta also says that mistakes will still happen. Third, memory and personalization. For memory and personalization, Muse scores 8.8 out of 10. Its memory carries across conversations and you can open the memory files and edit them yourself. There is one long-running chat plus side chats for separate projects, a goals tab for long-term plans, and an ideas feed built from what it learns about you. You can even give your agent its own name and look. Proactive messages can be turned down or off. The trade-off is that an agent that remembers a lot and speaks first can feel intrusive, so check those settings early. By the way, I have created a document of 50 best growth hacks used by the biggest marketers out there. Check the link below. Now, integrations and ecosystem. For integrations and ecosystem, Muse scores 7.8 out of 10. It connects to apps like email calendar Instagram Facebook and WhatsApp and you choose what it can see and do. If an app is missing, it can try to build its own tool. The business version lists many more connections, including Notion, Slack, Shopify, and QuickBooks. The limits are that the consumer side is narrower than developer-focused agents. A couple of security features like one-password support are still marked coming soon and availability is limited to the United States, with Canada listed for the business product. Here is privacy, safety, and control. For privacy, safety, and control, Muse scores 8.4 out of 10. Muse asks for approval before irreversible actions, such as sending an email or paying, and you get an audit trail of what it did and what it plans to do. A separate checking agent called Sentinel controls what leaves your private computer. Your logins sit in a store Muse cannot see, and checkout uses a one-time card number. Meta also runs a public bug bounty of up to $300,000. But, there are real caveats. Conversations may be used for model training, unless you opt out in settings. Browsing activity can indirectly influence ads, and Meta can still access data when needed for support or security. A fully private version is planned, but it has not shipped yet. Next pricing. For pricing, Muse scores 8.0 out of 10. There is a free plan with a weekly usage limit. Meta has not published the exact free allowance, though journalists report about 100 million tokens a week. Paid plans are reported at $20 a month for power and $100 a month for max, with the same features and just more weekly usage. Usage is measured in tokens, not messages, and it does not roll over. So, heavy agent work can burn through the free tier fast. Because these prices come from press reports, check the live plan page before you pay. Finally, who is Muse best for? Muse is best for busy people in the United States who want tasks completed, not just answered, especially if you already live in WhatsApp, Instagram, or Gmail. It also suits people who want a personal assistant that remembers, plans, and works while they sleep. Skip it if you are outside supported countries, if you want your data kept strictly away from model training, or if you need a deep library of third-party integrations. For those needs, look at the other assistants in this series. Thanks for watching. For reasoning and answer quality, Grok Bot scores 9.2 out of 10. Its strength is working through research and multi-step prompts with access to the web, files, and tools to support more grounded answers. That makes it useful when a request involves more than a quick explanation. It can gather information and turn it into something practical. These are editorial ratings of its capabilities, not a controlled performance benchmark. Important facts and finished outputs still need a review before you rely on them. For task completion and agentic ability, Grok Bot scores 9.5 out of 10. It can carry out multi-step work on a persistent cloud computer, rather than simply describe what you should do next. Browsing websites, managing files, and using connected apps can all form part of the same task. The practical benefit is delegation. You describe a result and the bot works toward it. Sensitive or complex actions may still require approval. Clear instructions about spending, access, and the expected result help keep that delegation under control. For personalization and memory, Grok Bot scores 9.3 out of 10. It retains preferences, context, and prior instructions. So, you do not have to explain everything again for every task. Persistent browser sessions and saved project work also help it pick up where earlier work stopped. This is particularly useful for recurring tasks with familiar requirements. Stored context is not a guarantee that every detail will stay current, though. Refresh changed instructions and check that the bot is using the right information before an important task. For integration and ecosystem, Grok Bot scores 9.1 out of 10. It connects with email, calendars, files, and external tools. Browser automation extends its reach beyond dedicated integrations, allowing it to work with more of the services you already use. That flexibility is valuable when a task crosses several apps. Access still depends on the service involved. Some websites require a login, restrict automation, or ask for human verification. So, a broad range of connections does not mean every workflow will run without intervention. For ease of use and accessibility, Grok Grokbot scores 8.8 out of 10. You start by describing a task in natural language without needing to write code or build a visual automation. That lowers the barrier to trying useful tasks and refining the instructions as you go. Advanced setups still need permissions and configuration. Start with a small, clearly defined request, then check the result. A simple conversational interface helps, but the quality of your instructions and the access you grant still matter. For speed and reliability, Grokbot scores 8.2 out of 10. Cloud-based work can continue while you are offline, and parallel bots can help with several ongoing tasks. That can save you from waiting in front of the screen for each step. It does not guarantee instant results. Website changes, verification checks, and retries can slow a workflow or require your attention. Judge the time saved by the completed correct result, rather than just how quickly the bot starts responding. For privacy and safety, Grokbot scores 8.4 out of 10. Its cloud computer is assigned to your account, helping separate your work from other users. Bots within your account share files, browser sessions, and logins. So, that is not isolation between your own bots. Approval controls provide safeguards for sensitive actions. Broad account permissions still need careful management. Give access deliberately. Understand what the bot can reach and keep oversight of actions that affect your accounts or other people. For pricing and overall value, Grok Bot scores 8.1 out of 10. Access comes through eligible paid plans, rather than a full free tier. The value is strongest when you regularly delegate useful work and recover meaningful time from it. Heavy users should pay attention to included usage and any additional charges. Compare the total cost with the tasks you actually complete, not just the number of features available. Frequent successful automation is what makes the subscription worthwhile. Microsoft Copilot is Microsoft's everyday AI assistant for chat, images, research, and help inside your Microsoft apps. This review is about the consumer app, not the separate work version. It is also changing fast. In August, Microsoft merged its personal and work Copilot apps into one and retired a few features along the way. So, here is how it stacks up. We cover task automation, reasoning memory integrations privacy and control, pricing, and who it is best for. First, task automation and agent power. For task automation and agent power, Microsoft Copilot scores 7.0 out of 10. Copilot actions can handle things like reservations, tickets, travel bookings, and gift purchases through partners such as Booking.com, Expedia, and OpenTable. And Microsoft says it will not book or buy anything without your confirmation. Since the merger, agents and complex multi-step tasks need a Microsoft 365 subscription. The limits are that actions was announced in 2025 and I could not confirm where it works today. It has no always-on background agent and Microsoft's planned super app with co-work and autopilot agents was due this quarter, but I could not confirm it has shipped. Next, reasoning and answer quality. For reasoning and answer quality, Microsoft Copilot scores 7.8 out of 10. In late 2025, Microsoft said Copilot worked with OpenAI's models alongside its own in-house models and a model picker is now starting to appear. The caveat is that recent coverage does not clearly name which model answers which request and I found no independent benchmark of the consumer app itself. So, treat this score as an editorial estimate and check the answers that matter. Third, memory and personalization. For memory and personalization, Microsoft Copilot scores 7.8 out of 10. It has long-term memory that can resurface goals, birthdays, and ongoing tasks and you can view, edit, or delete what it saved from your privacy settings. Paid Microsoft 365 plans add proactive suggestions. There is also a real talk style that pushes back more instead of just agreeing, but Microsoft retired several personal touches on August 18th, including the Miko character, group chat, and podcasts. So, the experience is narrower than a year ago. Now, integrations and ecosystem. For integrations and ecosystem, Microsoft Copilot scores 8.6 out of 10. This is where it shines. It is available on the web, Windows, Mac, iPhone, Android, Edge, and the Xbox app. With a Microsoft 365 plan, you can open Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook with Copilot built in. It can also connect to Outlook, Gmail, Google Drive, and calendars with your approval. The limits are that the best office features sit behind the paid tiers, and personal Copilot premium features cannot be shared with other people. Here is privacy, safety, and control. For privacy, safety, and control, Microsoft Copilot scores 7.5 out of 10. Personal and work accounts stay separate, so your employer cannot see your personal activity. Memory is managed in your privacy settings, and the "Hey Copilot" wake word is off by default with detection happening on your device. Copilot also asks for confirmation before it books or buys. The caveat is that details about conversation history, model training, and personalization now live in a separate privacy FAQ, and I could not verify the training and retention terms. So, read that page before you rely on it. Next, pricing. For pricing, Microsoft Copilot scores 8.2 out of 10. Chat, image creation, and file uploads stay free with usage limits that Microsoft does not spell out. Microsoft 365 Personal and Family raise those limits, and Microsoft 365 Premium, reported at about $20 a month, has the highest limits and the agent features. The old standalone Copilot Pro plan was retired. These prices come from third-party summaries because Microsoft's own page does not list them. So, confirm the current price before you buy. Finally, who is Microsoft Copilot best for? It is best for people who already use Windows or Microsoft 365 and want AI built into Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook, plus a free assistant for everyday questions. Skip it if you want an autonomous agent that works in the background, or if you want clear details on training and retention before you start. Thanks for watching. By the way, I have also made an ultimate video comparing all of the different softwares, so go check that out. Link in the description. And don't forget I have special discounts and crazy bonuses if you use my affiliate link. So, if you enjoyed this, check out all of those links.

Assistir ao vídeo original no YouTube

Assuntos: Assistente pessoal, Assistente pessoal, Muse. Publicado no YouTube em 2026-10-23.

Seleção automática por assunto e idioma. O vídeo pertence ao canal de origem.